ecryptfs: don't allow mmap when the lower fs doesn't support it
authorJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Tue, 5 Jul 2016 21:32:30 +0000 (17:32 -0400)
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:37:18 +0000 (22:37 +0100)
commit f0fe970df3838c202ef6c07a4c2b36838ef0a88b upstream.

There are legitimate reasons to disallow mmap on certain files, notably
in sysfs or procfs.  We shouldn't emulate mmap support on file systems
that don't offer support natively.

CVE-2016-1583

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
[tyhicks: clean up f_op check by using ecryptfs_file_to_lower()]
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
fs/ecryptfs/file.c

index 464fe1f..298f5b2 100644 (file)
@@ -183,6 +183,19 @@ out:
        return rc;
 }
 
        return rc;
 }
 
+static int ecryptfs_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+{
+       struct file *lower_file = ecryptfs_file_to_lower(file);
+       /*
+        * Don't allow mmap on top of file systems that don't support it
+        * natively.  If FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH > 2 or ecryptfs
+        * allows recursive mounting, this will need to be extended.
+        */
+       if (!lower_file->f_op->mmap)
+               return -ENODEV;
+       return generic_file_mmap(file, vma);
+}
+
 /**
  * ecryptfs_open
  * @inode: inode speciying file to open
 /**
  * ecryptfs_open
  * @inode: inode speciying file to open
@@ -382,7 +395,7 @@ const struct file_operations ecryptfs_main_fops = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
        .compat_ioctl = ecryptfs_compat_ioctl,
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
        .compat_ioctl = ecryptfs_compat_ioctl,
 #endif
-       .mmap = generic_file_mmap,
+       .mmap = ecryptfs_mmap,
        .open = ecryptfs_open,
        .flush = ecryptfs_flush,
        .release = ecryptfs_release,
        .open = ecryptfs_open,
        .flush = ecryptfs_flush,
        .release = ecryptfs_release,