smc911x: test after postfix decrement fails in smc911x_{reset,drop_pkt}
authorRoel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:50:48 +0000 (13:50 -0700)
committerJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Fri, 25 Apr 2008 06:08:55 +0000 (02:08 -0400)
When timeout reaches 0 the postfix decrement still subtracts, so the test
fails.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
drivers/net/smc911x.c

index 8fbc08b..4e28002 100644 (file)
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)
                do {
                        udelay(10);
                        reg = SMC_GET_PMT_CTRL() & PMT_CTRL_READY_;
-               } while ( timeout-- && !reg);
+               } while (--timeout && !reg);
                if (timeout == 0) {
                        PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for PM restore\n", dev->name);
                        return;
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static void smc911x_reset(struct net_device *dev)
                                resets++;
                                break;
                        }
-               } while ( timeout-- && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
+               } while (--timeout && (reg & HW_CFG_SRST_));
        }
        if (timeout == 0) {
                PRINTK("%s: smc911x_reset timeout waiting for reset\n", dev->name);
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static inline void smc911x_drop_pkt(struct net_device *dev)
                do {
                        udelay(10);
                        reg = SMC_GET_RX_DP_CTRL() & RX_DP_CTRL_FFWD_BUSY_;
-               } while ( timeout-- && reg);
+               } while (--timeout && reg);
                if (timeout == 0) {
                        PRINTK("%s: timeout waiting for RX fast forward\n", dev->name);
                }