RDMA/addr: Fix some cancellation problems in process_req()
authorKrishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:32:34 +0000 (16:02 +0530)
committerRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:33:09 +0000 (15:33 -0800)
Fix following problems in process_req() relating to cancellation:

- Function is wrongly doing another addr_remote() when cancelled,
  which is not required.
- Make failure reporting immediate by using time_after_eq().
- On cancellation, -ETIMEDOUT was returned to the callback routine
  instead of the more appropriate -ECANCELLED (users getting notified
  may want to print/return this status, eg ucma_event_handler).

Signed-off-by: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
drivers/infiniband/core/addr.c

index a68d7c7..15ba518 100644 (file)
@@ -225,17 +225,16 @@ static void process_req(void *data)
 
        mutex_lock(&lock);
        list_for_each_entry_safe(req, temp_req, &req_list, list) {
-               if (req->status) {
+               if (req->status == -ENODATA) {
                        src_in = (struct sockaddr_in *) &req->src_addr;
                        dst_in = (struct sockaddr_in *) &req->dst_addr;
                        req->status = addr_resolve_remote(src_in, dst_in,
                                                          req->addr);
+                       if (req->status && time_after_eq(jiffies, req->timeout))
+                               req->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
+                       else if (req->status == -ENODATA)
+                               continue;
                }
-               if (req->status && time_after(jiffies, req->timeout))
-                       req->status = -ETIMEDOUT;
-               else if (req->status == -ENODATA)
-                       continue;
-
                list_del(&req->list);
                list_add_tail(&req->list, &done_list);
        }