net/mlx4_core: Fix GEN_EQE accessing uninitialixed mutex
authorJack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 13:18:39 +0000 (15:18 +0200)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tue, 24 Mar 2015 19:22:52 +0000 (15:22 -0400)
We occasionally see in procedure mlx4_GEN_EQE that the driver tries
to grab an uninitialized mutex.

This can occur in only one of two ways:
1. We are trying to generate an async event on an uninitialized slave.
2. We are trying to generate an async event on an illegal slave number
   ( < 0 or > persist->num_vfs) or an inactive slave.

To deal with #1: move the mutex initialization from specific slave init
sequence in procedure mlx_master_do_cmd to mlx4_multi_func_init() (so that
the mutex is always initialized for all slaves).

To deal with #2: check in procedure mlx4_GEN_EQE that the slave number
provided is in the proper range and that the slave is active.

Signed-off-by: Jack Morgenstein <jackm@dev.mellanox.co.il>
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/cmd.c
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/eq.c
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/resource_tracker.c

index a681d7c..3350721 100644 (file)
@@ -1993,7 +1993,6 @@ static void mlx4_master_do_cmd(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, u8 cmd,
                        goto reset_slave;
                slave_state[slave].vhcr_dma = ((u64) param) << 48;
                priv->mfunc.master.slave_state[slave].cookie = 0;
-               mutex_init(&priv->mfunc.master.gen_eqe_mutex[slave]);
                break;
        case MLX4_COMM_CMD_VHCR1:
                if (slave_state[slave].last_cmd != MLX4_COMM_CMD_VHCR0)
@@ -2225,6 +2224,7 @@ int mlx4_multi_func_init(struct mlx4_dev *dev)
                for (i = 0; i < dev->num_slaves; ++i) {
                        s_state = &priv->mfunc.master.slave_state[i];
                        s_state->last_cmd = MLX4_COMM_CMD_RESET;
+                       mutex_init(&priv->mfunc.master.gen_eqe_mutex[i]);
                        for (j = 0; j < MLX4_EVENT_TYPES_NUM; ++j)
                                s_state->event_eq[j].eqn = -1;
                        __raw_writel((__force u32) 0,
index 264bc15..6e70ffe 100644 (file)
@@ -153,12 +153,10 @@ void mlx4_gen_slave_eqe(struct work_struct *work)
 
                /* All active slaves need to receive the event */
                if (slave == ALL_SLAVES) {
-                       for (i = 0; i < dev->num_slaves; i++) {
-                               if (i != dev->caps.function &&
-                                   master->slave_state[i].active)
-                                       if (mlx4_GEN_EQE(dev, i, eqe))
-                                               mlx4_warn(dev, "Failed to generate event for slave %d\n",
-                                                         i);
+                       for (i = 0; i <= dev->persist->num_vfs; i++) {
+                               if (mlx4_GEN_EQE(dev, i, eqe))
+                                       mlx4_warn(dev, "Failed to generate event for slave %d\n",
+                                                 i);
                        }
                } else {
                        if (mlx4_GEN_EQE(dev, slave, eqe))
@@ -203,13 +201,11 @@ static void mlx4_slave_event(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave,
                             struct mlx4_eqe *eqe)
 {
        struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
-       struct mlx4_slave_state *s_slave =
-               &priv->mfunc.master.slave_state[slave];
 
-       if (!s_slave->active) {
-               /*mlx4_warn(dev, "Trying to pass event to inactive slave\n");*/
+       if (slave < 0 || slave > dev->persist->num_vfs ||
+           slave == dev->caps.function ||
+           !priv->mfunc.master.slave_state[slave].active)
                return;
-       }
 
        slave_event(dev, slave, eqe);
 }
index d97ca88..6e413ac 100644 (file)
@@ -3095,6 +3095,12 @@ int mlx4_GEN_EQE(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int slave, struct mlx4_eqe *eqe)
        if (!priv->mfunc.master.slave_state)
                return -EINVAL;
 
+       /* check for slave valid, slave not PF, and slave active */
+       if (slave < 0 || slave > dev->persist->num_vfs ||
+           slave == dev->caps.function ||
+           !priv->mfunc.master.slave_state[slave].active)
+               return 0;
+
        event_eq = &priv->mfunc.master.slave_state[slave].event_eq[eqe->type];
 
        /* Create the event only if the slave is registered */