ipv6: don't count addrconf generated routes against gc limit
authorHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Sat, 7 Dec 2013 02:33:45 +0000 (03:33 +0100)
committerBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Sat, 15 Feb 2014 19:20:08 +0000 (19:20 +0000)
[ Upstream commit a3300ef4bbb1f1e33ff0400e1e6cf7733d988f4f ]

Brett Ciphery reported that new ipv6 addresses failed to get installed
because the addrconf generated dsts where counted against the dst gc
limit. We don't need to count those routes like we currently don't count
administratively added routes.

Because the max_addresses check enforces a limit on unbounded address
generation first in case someone plays with router advertisments, we
are still safe here.

Reported-by: Brett Ciphery <brett.ciphery@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
net/ipv6/route.c

index 1768238..9a4f437 100644 (file)
@@ -2058,15 +2058,11 @@ struct rt6_info *addrconf_dst_alloc(struct inet6_dev *idev,
 {
        struct net *net = dev_net(idev->dev);
        struct rt6_info *rt = ip6_dst_alloc(&net->ipv6.ip6_dst_ops,
-                                           net->loopback_dev, 0);
+                                           net->loopback_dev, DST_NOCOUNT);
        struct neighbour *neigh;
 
-       if (rt == NULL) {
-               if (net_ratelimit())
-                       pr_warning("IPv6:  Maximum number of routes reached,"
-                                  " consider increasing route/max_size.\n");
+       if (rt == NULL)
                return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-       }
 
        in6_dev_hold(idev);