printk: Fix console_sem vs logbuf_lock unlock race
authorPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:20:09 +0000 (11:20 +0200)
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:39:34 +0000 (11:39 +0200)
Fix up the fallout from commit 0b5e1c5255 ("printk: Release
console_sem after logbuf_lock").

The reason for unlocking the console_sem under the logbuf_lock
is that a concurrent printk() might fill up the buffer but fail
to acquire the console sem, resulting in a missed write to the
console until a subsequent console_sem acquire/release cycle.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: efault@gmx.de
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1308734409.1022.14.camel@twins
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
kernel/printk.c

index 751e7b8..37dff34 100644 (file)
@@ -1244,7 +1244,7 @@ void console_unlock(void)
 {
        unsigned long flags;
        unsigned _con_start, _log_end;
 {
        unsigned long flags;
        unsigned _con_start, _log_end;
-       unsigned wake_klogd = 0;
+       unsigned wake_klogd = 0, retry = 0;
 
        if (console_suspended) {
                up(&console_sem);
 
        if (console_suspended) {
                up(&console_sem);
@@ -1253,6 +1253,7 @@ void console_unlock(void)
 
        console_may_schedule = 0;
 
 
        console_may_schedule = 0;
 
+again:
        for ( ; ; ) {
                spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
                wake_klogd |= log_start - log_end;
        for ( ; ; ) {
                spin_lock_irqsave(&logbuf_lock, flags);
                wake_klogd |= log_start - log_end;
@@ -1273,8 +1274,23 @@ void console_unlock(void)
        if (unlikely(exclusive_console))
                exclusive_console = NULL;
 
        if (unlikely(exclusive_console))
                exclusive_console = NULL;
 
-       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
+       spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
+
        up(&console_sem);
        up(&console_sem);
+
+       /*
+        * Someone could have filled up the buffer again, so re-check if there's
+        * something to flush. In case we cannot trylock the console_sem again,
+        * there's a new owner and the console_unlock() from them will do the
+        * flush, no worries.
+        */
+       spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
+       if (con_start != log_end)
+               retry = 1;
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&logbuf_lock, flags);
+       if (retry && console_trylock())
+               goto again;
+
        if (wake_klogd)
                wake_up_klogd();
 }
        if (wake_klogd)
                wake_up_klogd();
 }