Correct priority problem in the use of ! and &.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
- !E & C
+ !(E & C)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
isp1362_clr_mask16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT, HCBUFSTAT_ISTL0_FULL);
DBG(1, "%s: ISTL0\n", __func__);
WARN_ON((int)!!isp1362_hcd->istl_flip);
isp1362_clr_mask16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT, HCBUFSTAT_ISTL0_FULL);
DBG(1, "%s: ISTL0\n", __func__);
WARN_ON((int)!!isp1362_hcd->istl_flip);
- WARN_ON(isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) & HCBUFSTAT_ISTL0_ACTIVE);
- WARN_ON(!isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) & HCBUFSTAT_ISTL0_DONE);
+ WARN_ON(isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) &
+ HCBUFSTAT_ISTL0_ACTIVE);
+ WARN_ON(!(isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) &
+ HCBUFSTAT_ISTL0_DONE));
isp1362_hcd->irqenb &= ~HCuPINT_ISTL0;
}
isp1362_hcd->irqenb &= ~HCuPINT_ISTL0;
}
isp1362_clr_mask16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT, HCBUFSTAT_ISTL1_FULL);
DBG(1, "%s: ISTL1\n", __func__);
WARN_ON(!(int)isp1362_hcd->istl_flip);
isp1362_clr_mask16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT, HCBUFSTAT_ISTL1_FULL);
DBG(1, "%s: ISTL1\n", __func__);
WARN_ON(!(int)isp1362_hcd->istl_flip);
- WARN_ON(isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) & HCBUFSTAT_ISTL1_ACTIVE);
- WARN_ON(!isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) & HCBUFSTAT_ISTL1_DONE);
+ WARN_ON(isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) &
+ HCBUFSTAT_ISTL1_ACTIVE);
+ WARN_ON(!(isp1362_read_reg16(isp1362_hcd, HCBUFSTAT) &
+ HCBUFSTAT_ISTL1_DONE));
isp1362_hcd->irqenb &= ~HCuPINT_ISTL1;
}
isp1362_hcd->irqenb &= ~HCuPINT_ISTL1;
}