nozomi: Fix mutex handling
[pandora-kernel.git] / drivers / char / nozomi.c
index cd405bc..fac9157 100644 (file)
@@ -1693,15 +1693,7 @@ static int ntty_write(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *buffer,
        if (!dc || !port)
                return -ENODEV;
 
-       if (unlikely(!mutex_trylock(&port->tty_sem))) {
-               /*
-                * must test lock as tty layer wraps calls
-                * to this function with BKL
-                */
-               dev_err(&dc->pdev->dev, "Would have deadlocked - "
-                       "return EAGAIN\n");
-               return -EAGAIN;
-       }
+       mutex_lock(&port->tty_sem);
 
        if (unlikely(!port->port.count)) {
                DBG1(" ");
@@ -1741,25 +1733,23 @@ exit:
  * This method is called by the upper tty layer.
  *   #according to sources N_TTY.c it expects a value >= 0 and
  *    does not check for negative values.
+ *
+ * If the port is unplugged report lots of room and let the bits
+ * dribble away so we don't block anything.
  */
 static int ntty_write_room(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
        struct port *port = tty->driver_data;
-       int room = 0;
+       int room = 4096;
        const struct nozomi *dc = get_dc_by_tty(tty);
 
-       if (!dc || !port)
-               return 0;
-       if (!mutex_trylock(&port->tty_sem))
-               return 0;
-
-       if (!port->port.count)
-               goto exit;
-
-       room = port->fifo_ul.size - kfifo_len(&port->fifo_ul);
-
-exit:
-       mutex_unlock(&port->tty_sem);
+       if (dc) {
+               mutex_lock(&port->tty_sem);
+               if (port->port.count)
+                       room = port->fifo_ul.size -
+                                       kfifo_len(&port->fifo_ul);
+               mutex_unlock(&port->tty_sem);
+       }
        return room;
 }