* all outstanding updates to complete.
*/
-#ifdef COMMIT_STATS
- spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
- summarise_journal_usage(journal);
- spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
-#endif
-
/* Do we need to erase the effects of a prior journal_flush? */
if (journal->j_flags & JFS_FLUSHED) {
jbd_debug(3, "super block updated\n");
* we do not require it to remember exactly which old buffers it
* has reserved. This is consistent with the existing behaviour
* that multiple journal_get_write_access() calls to the same
- * buffer are perfectly permissable.
+ * buffer are perfectly permissible.
*/
while (commit_transaction->t_reserved_list) {
jh = commit_transaction->t_reserved_list;
required. */
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "file as BJ_Forget");
journal_file_buffer(jh, commit_transaction, BJ_Forget);
- /* Wake up any transactions which were waiting for this
- IO to complete */
+ /*
+ * Wake up any transactions which were waiting for this
+ * IO to complete. The barrier must be here so that changes
+ * by journal_file_buffer() take effect before wake_up_bit()
+ * does the waitqueue check.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
wake_up_bit(&bh->b_state, BH_Unshadow);
JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "brelse shadowed buffer");
__brelse(bh);