Pull cpuidle into release branch

[pandora-kernel.git] / Documentation / SubmittingPatches

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index 3f9a791..681e2b3 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ then only post say 15 or so at a time and wait for review and integration.
 
 Check your patch for basic style violations, details of which can be
 found in Documentation/CodingStyle.  Failure to do so simply wastes
-the reviewers time and will get your patch rejected, probabally
+the reviewers time and will get your patch rejected, probably
 without even being read.
 
 At a minimum you should check your patches with the patch style
-checker prior to submission (scripts/patchcheck.pl).  You should
+checker prior to submission (scripts/checkpatch.pl).  You should
 be able to justify all violations that remain in your patch.
 
 
@@ -464,8 +464,8 @@ section Linus Computer Science 101.
 Nuff said.  If your code deviates too much from this, it is likely
 to be rejected without further review, and without comment.
 
-Once significant exception is when moving code from one file to
-another in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in
+One significant exception is when moving code from one file to
+another -- in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in
 the same patch which moves it.  This clearly delineates the act of
 moving the code and your changes.  This greatly aids review of the
 actual differences and allows tools to better track the history of
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
   <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112112749912944&w=2>
 
 Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle:
-  <http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/source/Documentation/CodingStyle>
+  <http://users.sosdg.org/~qiyong/lxr/source/Documentation/CodingStyle>
 
 Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
   <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>