drbd: we should write meta data updates with FLUSH FUA
authorLars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
Tue, 28 Jun 2011 11:22:48 +0000 (13:22 +0200)
committerPhilipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Thu, 30 Jun 2011 07:23:46 +0000 (09:23 +0200)
We used to write these with BIO_RW_BARRIER aka REQ_HARDBARRIER (unless
disabled in the configuration). The correct semantic now would be to
write with FLUSH/FUA.
For example, with activity log transactions, FUA alone is not enough, we
need the corresponding bitmap update (and all related application
updates) on stable storage as well.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_actlog.c

index 09ef9a8..cf0e63d 100644 (file)
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static int _drbd_md_sync_page_io(struct drbd_conf *mdev,
        md_io.error = 0;
 
        if ((rw & WRITE) && !test_bit(MD_NO_FUA, &mdev->flags))
-               rw |= REQ_FUA;
+               rw |= REQ_FUA | REQ_FLUSH;
        rw |= REQ_SYNC;
 
        bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, 1);