jbd/jbd2: nuke write_super from comments
authorArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Wed, 25 Jul 2012 15:12:07 +0000 (18:12 +0300)
committerAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Sat, 4 Aug 2012 08:15:36 +0000 (12:15 +0400)
The '->write_super' superblock method is gone, and this patch removes all the
references to 'write_super' from various jbd and jbd2.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
fs/jbd/journal.c
fs/jbd2/journal.c

index 425c2f2..0935750 100644 (file)
@@ -534,8 +534,8 @@ int journal_start_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t *ptid)
                ret = 1;
        } else if (journal->j_committing_transaction) {
                /*
-                * If ext3_write_super() recently started a commit, then we
-                * have to wait for completion of that transaction
+                * If commit has been started, then we have to wait for
+                * completion of that transaction.
                 */
                if (ptid)
                        *ptid = journal->j_committing_transaction->t_tid;
index e9a3c4c..8625da2 100644 (file)
@@ -612,8 +612,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_start_commit(journal_t *journal, tid_t *ptid)
                ret = 1;
        } else if (journal->j_committing_transaction) {
                /*
-                * If ext3_write_super() recently started a commit, then we
-                * have to wait for completion of that transaction
+                * If commit has been started, then we have to wait for
+                * completion of that transaction.
                 */
                if (ptid)
                        *ptid = journal->j_committing_transaction->t_tid;