mtd: Use BLOCK_NIL consistently in NFTL/INFTL
authorJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:55:32 +0000 (09:55 +0200)
committerDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Sat, 27 Jun 2009 08:22:10 +0000 (09:22 +0100)
Use BLOCK_NIL consistently rather than sometimes 0xffff and sometimes
BLOCK_NIL.

The semantic patch that finds this issue is below
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/).  On the other hand, the changes
were made by hand, in part because drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c contains dead
code that causes spatch to ignore a relevant function.  Specifically, the
function INFTL_findwriteunit contains a do-while loop, but always takes a
return that leaves the loop on the first iteration.

// <smpl>
@r exists@
identifier f,C;
@@

f(...) { ... return C; }

@s@
identifier r.C;
expression E;
@@

@@
identifier r.f,r.C,I;
expression s.E;
@@

f(...) {
 <...
(
  I
|
- E
+ C
)
 ...>
}

// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
drivers/mtd/inftlcore.c
drivers/mtd/nftlcore.c

index 73f0522..d8cf29c 100644 (file)
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static u16 INFTL_findfreeblock(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, int desperate)
        if (!desperate && inftl->numfreeEUNs < 2) {
                DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL1, "INFTL: there are too few free "
                        "EUNs (%d)\n", inftl->numfreeEUNs);
-               return 0xffff;
+               return BLOCK_NIL;
        }
 
        /* Scan for a free block */
@@ -281,7 +281,8 @@ static u16 INFTL_foldchain(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned
        silly = MAX_LOOPS;
        while (thisEUN < inftl->nb_blocks) {
                for (block = 0; block < inftl->EraseSize/SECTORSIZE; block ++) {
-                       if ((BlockMap[block] != 0xffff) || BlockDeleted[block])
+                       if ((BlockMap[block] != BLOCK_NIL) ||
+                           BlockDeleted[block])
                                continue;
 
                        if (inftl_read_oob(mtd, (thisEUN * inftl->EraseSize)
@@ -525,7 +526,7 @@ static inline u16 INFTL_findwriteunit(struct INFTLrecord *inftl, unsigned block)
                        if (!silly--) {
                                printk(KERN_WARNING "INFTL: infinite loop in "
                                        "Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n", thisVUC);
-                               return 0xffff;
+                               return BLOCK_NIL;
                        }
 
                        /* Skip to next block in chain */
@@ -549,7 +550,7 @@ hitused:
                         * waiting to be picked up. We're going to have to fold
                         * a chain to make room.
                         */
-                       thisEUN = INFTL_makefreeblock(inftl, 0xffff);
+                       thisEUN = INFTL_makefreeblock(inftl, BLOCK_NIL);
 
                        /*
                         * Hopefully we free something, lets try again.
@@ -631,7 +632,7 @@ hitused:
 
        printk(KERN_WARNING "INFTL: error folding to make room for Virtual "
                "Unit Chain 0x%x\n", thisVUC);
-       return 0xffff;
+       return BLOCK_NIL;
 }
 
 /*
index e3f8495..fb86cac 100644 (file)
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_findfreeblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int desperate )
        /* Normally, we force a fold to happen before we run out of free blocks completely */
        if (!desperate && nftl->numfreeEUNs < 2) {
                DEBUG(MTD_DEBUG_LEVEL1, "NFTL_findfreeblock: there are too few free EUNs\n");
-               return 0xffff;
+               return BLOCK_NIL;
        }
 
        /* Scan for a free block */
@@ -230,11 +230,11 @@ static u16 NFTL_findfreeblock(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, int desperate )
                        printk("Argh! No free blocks found! LastFreeEUN = %d, "
                               "FirstEUN = %d\n", nftl->LastFreeEUN,
                               le16_to_cpu(nftl->MediaHdr.FirstPhysicalEUN));
-                       return 0xffff;
+                       return BLOCK_NIL;
                }
        } while (pot != nftl->LastFreeEUN);
 
-       return 0xffff;
+       return BLOCK_NIL;
 }
 
 static u16 NFTL_foldchain (struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned pendingblock )
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_foldchain (struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned thisVUC, unsigned p
 
        /* add the header so that it is now a valid chain */
        oob.u.a.VirtUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareVirtUnitNum = cpu_to_le16(thisVUC);
-       oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum = 0xffff;
+       oob.u.a.ReplUnitNum = oob.u.a.SpareReplUnitNum = BLOCK_NIL;
 
        nftl_write_oob(mtd, (nftl->EraseSize * targetEUN) + 8,
                       8, &retlen, (char *)&oob.u);
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static u16 NFTL_makefreeblock( struct NFTLrecord *nftl , unsigned pendingblock)
        if (ChainLength < 2) {
                printk(KERN_WARNING "No Virtual Unit Chains available for folding. "
                       "Failing request\n");
-               return 0xffff;
+               return BLOCK_NIL;
        }
 
        return NFTL_foldchain (nftl, LongestChain, pendingblock);
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
                                printk(KERN_WARNING
                                       "Infinite loop in Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
                                       thisVUC);
-                               return 0xffff;
+                               return BLOCK_NIL;
                        }
 
                        /* Skip to next block in chain */
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
                        //u16 startEUN = nftl->EUNtable[thisVUC];
 
                        //printk("Write to VirtualUnitChain %d, calling makefreeblock()\n", thisVUC);
-                       writeEUN = NFTL_makefreeblock(nftl, 0xffff);
+                       writeEUN = NFTL_makefreeblock(nftl, BLOCK_NIL);
 
                        if (writeEUN == BLOCK_NIL) {
                                /* OK, we accept that the above comment is
@@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static inline u16 NFTL_findwriteunit(struct NFTLrecord *nftl, unsigned block)
 
        printk(KERN_WARNING "Error folding to make room for Virtual Unit Chain 0x%x\n",
               thisVUC);
-       return 0xffff;
+       return BLOCK_NIL;
 }
 
 static int nftl_writeblock(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *mbd, unsigned long block,