ide-tape: make function name more accurate

idetape_active_next_stage() was rather ambiguous wrt its purpose. Make that
more explicit and remove superfluous comment.

Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>

diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
index 2d4d282..8b9da8b 100644 (file)
--- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c
@@ -846,10 +846,7 @@ static void idetape_analyze_error(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 *sense)
        }
 }
 
-/*
- * idetape_active_next_stage will declare the next stage as "active".
- */
-static void idetape_active_next_stage (ide_drive_t *drive)
+static void idetape_activate_next_stage(ide_drive_t *drive)
 {
        idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data;
        idetape_stage_t *stage = tape->next_stage;
@@ -1040,7 +1037,7 @@ static int idetape_end_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int uptodate, int nr_sects)
                        }
                }
                if (tape->next_stage != NULL) {
-                       idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
+                       idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
 
                        /*
                         * Insert the next request into the request queue.
@@ -2414,7 +2411,7 @@ static void idetape_insert_pipeline_into_queue (ide_drive_t *drive)
                return;
        if (!idetape_pipeline_active(tape)) {
                set_bit(IDETAPE_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags);
-               idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
+               idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
                (void) ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, tape->active_data_request, ide_end);
        }
 }