Btrfs: fix wrong orphan count of the fs/file tree
authorMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 04:13:02 +0000 (22:13 -0600)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Mon, 1 Oct 2012 19:19:05 +0000 (15:19 -0400)
If we add a new orphan item, we should increase the atomic counter,
not decrease it. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
fs/btrfs/inode.c

index 878116d..a6824bd 100644 (file)
@@ -2228,7 +2228,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_add(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct inode *inode)
                        insert = 1;
 #endif
                insert = 1;
-               atomic_dec(&root->orphan_inodes);
+               atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes);
        }
 
        if (!test_and_set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_ORPHAN_META_RESERVED,