don't let BCM63XX_PHY depend on non-existant symbol
authorUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 23:43:33 +0000 (23:43 +0000)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tue, 5 Oct 2010 07:34:30 +0000 (00:34 -0700)
The kernel doesn't have a symbol called BCM63XX.  There is a symbol
BCM63XX_ENET (introduced in 9b1fc55a0500, 6 weeks after 09bb9aa0ed that
introduced BCM63XX_PHY), but the driver compiles without that, too.

Cc: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
drivers/net/phy/Kconfig

index eb799b3..cb3d13e 100644 (file)
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ config BROADCOM_PHY
 
 config BCM63XX_PHY
        tristate "Drivers for Broadcom 63xx SOCs internal PHY"
-       depends on BCM63XX
        ---help---
          Currently supports the 6348 and 6358 PHYs.