At some point the API of call_rcu() changed from three parameters
to two parameters, correct the documentation.
One confusing thing in RCU/listRCU.txt, which is NOT fixed in this patch,
is that no reason or explaination is given for using call_rcu() instead of
the normal synchronize_rcu() call.
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
list_for_each_entry(e, list, list) {
if (!audit_compare_rule(rule, &e->rule)) {
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
ne->rule.action = newaction;
ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
list_replace_rcu(e, ne);
ne->rule.action = newaction;
ne->rule.file_count = newfield_count;
list_replace_rcu(e, ne);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
e->deleted = 1;
spin_unlock(&e->lock);
list_del_rcu(&e->list);
e->deleted = 1;
spin_unlock(&e->lock);
- call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule, e);
+ call_rcu(&e->rcu, audit_free_rule);