MIPS: Fix harmlessly missing else statement.
authorRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Tue, 6 Nov 2012 13:27:19 +0000 (14:27 +0100)
committerRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:52:07 +0000 (16:52 +0100)
commit9ec9b5ac239ebfff333c25c4a7d34649cb29e4e4
treeadd188e2bf10446cc998cdc7b768c3aa7945ff95
parent90c9e79f5dc5af4ea16ad56dda8b648d21037486
MIPS: Fix harmlessly missing else statement.

The actual bug is a missing else statement - but really this should be
expressed using a switch() statement.

Found by Al Viro who writes "the funny thing is, it *does* work only
because r2 is syscall number and syscall number around 512 => return
value being ENOSYS and not one of ERESTART...  so we really can't hit
the first if and emerge from it with ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK.  still
wrong to write it that way..."

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
arch/mips/kernel/signal.c