From 2bce5daca28346f19c190dbdb5542c9fe3e8c6e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Don Zickus Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:32:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] perf, x86, nmi: Move LVT un-masking into irq handlers It was noticed that P4 machines were generating double NMIs for each perf event. These extra NMIs lead to 'Dazed and confused' messages on the screen. I tracked this down to a P4 quirk that said the overflow bit had to be cleared before re-enabling the apic LVT mask. My first attempt was to move the un-masking inside the perf nmi handler from before the chipset NMI handler to after. This broke Nehalem boxes that seem to like the unmasking before the counters themselves are re-enabled. In order to keep this change simple for 2.6.39, I decided to just simply move the apic LVT un-masking to the beginning of all the chipset NMI handlers, with the exception of Pentium4's to fix the double NMI issue. Later on we can move the un-masking to later in the handlers to save a number of 'extra' NMIs on those particular chipsets. I tested this change on a P4 machine, an AMD machine, a Nehalem box, and a core2quad box. 'perf top' worked correctly along with various other small 'perf record' runs. Anything high stress breaks all the machines but that is a different problem. Thanks to various people for testing different versions of this patch. Reported-and-tested-by: Shaun Ruffell Signed-off-by: Don Zickus Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303900353-10242-1-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar CC: Cyrill Gorcunov --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 12 ++++++++++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 10 ++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 17 +++++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c index fac0654021b8..e638689279d3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c @@ -1288,6 +1288,16 @@ static int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); + /* + * Some chipsets need to unmask the LVTPC in a particular spot + * inside the nmi handler. As a result, the unmasking was pushed + * into all the nmi handlers. + * + * This generic handler doesn't seem to have any issues where the + * unmasking occurs so it was left at the top. + */ + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); + for (idx = 0; idx < x86_pmu.num_counters; idx++) { if (!test_bit(idx, cpuc->active_mask)) { /* @@ -1374,8 +1384,6 @@ perf_event_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self, return NOTIFY_DONE; } - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); - handled = x86_pmu.handle_irq(args->regs); if (!handled) return NOTIFY_DONE; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c index 9ae4a2aa7398..e61539b07d2c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c @@ -933,6 +933,16 @@ static int intel_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); + /* + * Some chipsets need to unmask the LVTPC in a particular spot + * inside the nmi handler. As a result, the unmasking was pushed + * into all the nmi handlers. + * + * This handler doesn't seem to have any issues with the unmasking + * so it was left at the top. + */ + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); + intel_pmu_disable_all(); handled = intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer(); status = intel_pmu_get_status(); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c index d1f77e2934a1..e93fcd55fae1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c @@ -950,11 +950,20 @@ static int p4_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs) x86_pmu_stop(event, 0); } - if (handled) { - /* p4 quirk: unmask it again */ - apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, apic_read(APIC_LVTPC) & ~APIC_LVT_MASKED); + if (handled) inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs); - } + + /* + * When dealing with the unmasking of the LVTPC on P4 perf hw, it has + * been observed that the OVF bit flag has to be cleared first _before_ + * the LVTPC can be unmasked. + * + * The reason is the NMI line will continue to be asserted while the OVF + * bit is set. This causes a second NMI to generate if the LVTPC is + * unmasked before the OVF bit is cleared, leading to unknown NMI + * messages. + */ + apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, APIC_DM_NMI); return handled; } -- 2.39.2