x86: signal: handle_signal() should use set_current_blocked()

This is ugly, but if sigprocmask() needs retarget_shared_pending() then
handle signal should follow this logic. In theory it is newer correct to
add the new signals to current->blocked, the signal handler can sleep/etc
so we should notify other threads in case we block the pending signal and
nobody else has TIF_SIGPENDING.

Of course, this change doesn't make signals faster :/

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
index 4fd173c..5a8f5e6 100644 (file)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
@@ -682,6 +682,7 @@ static int
 handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
              sigset_t *oldset, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
+       sigset_t blocked;
        int ret;
 
        /* Are we from a system call? */
@@ -741,12 +742,10 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info, struct k_sigaction *ka,
         */
        regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
 
-       spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-       sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
+       sigorsets(&blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
        if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
-               sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
-       recalc_sigpending();
-       spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+               sigaddset(&blocked, sig);
+       set_current_blocked(&blocked);
 
        tracehook_signal_handler(sig, info, ka, regs,
                                 test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP));