[PATCH] Fix missing parens in set_personality()

If you call set_personality() with an expression such as:

	set_personality(foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2);

then this evaluates to:

	((current->personality == foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2) ? ...

which is obviously not the intended result.  Add the missing parents
to ensure this gets evaluated as expected:

	((current->personality == (foo ? PERS_FOO1 : PERS_FOO2)) ? ...

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

diff --git a/include/linux/personality.h b/include/linux/personality.h
index bf4cf20..012cd55 100644 (file)
--- a/include/linux/personality.h
+++ b/include/linux/personality.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ struct exec_domain {
  * Change personality of the currently running process.
  */
 #define set_personality(pers) \
-       ((current->personality == pers) ? 0 : __set_personality(pers))
+       ((current->personality == (pers)) ? 0 : __set_personality(pers))
 
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */