lib/list_sort: test: use more reasonable printk levels

I do not see any reason to use KERN_WARN for normal messages and
KERN_EMERG for error messages in the lib_sort testing routine.  Let's use
more reasonable KERN_NORM and KERN_ERR levels.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Cc: Don Mullis <don.mullis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/lib/list_sort.c b/lib/list_sort.c
index 8277940..679b3a0 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/list_sort.c
+++ b/lib/list_sort.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
        struct list_head *head = kmalloc(sizeof(*head), GFP_KERNEL);
        struct list_head *cur;
 
-       printk(KERN_WARNING "testing list_sort()\n");
+       printk(KERN_DEBUG "testing list_sort()\n");
 
        cur = head;
        for (i = 0; i < LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH; i++) {
@@ -189,17 +189,17 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
                struct debug_el *el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, l_h);
                int cmp_result = cmp(NULL, cur, cur->next);
                if (cur->next->prev != cur) {
-                       printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned "
-                                               "a corrupted list!\n");
+                       printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned "
+                                       "a corrupted list!\n");
                        return 1;
                } else if (cmp_result > 0) {
-                       printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
+                       printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to sort!\n");
                        return 1;
                } else if (cmp_result == 0 &&
                                el->serial >= container_of(cur->next,
                                        struct debug_el, l_h)->serial) {
-                       printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() failed to preserve order"
-                                                " of equivalent elements!\n");
+                       printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() failed to preserve order "
+                                       "of equivalent elements!\n");
                        return 1;
                }
                kfree(cur->prev);
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ static int __init list_sort_test(void)
        }
        kfree(cur);
        if (count != LIST_SORT_TEST_LENGTH) {
-               printk(KERN_EMERG "list_sort() returned list of"
-                                               "different length!\n");
+               printk(KERN_ERR "list_sort() returned list of "
+                               "different length!\n");
                return 1;
        }
        return 0;