Btrfs: fix __btrfs_start_workers retval
authorIlya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Sun, 3 Nov 2013 17:06:40 +0000 (19:06 +0200)
committerChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Thu, 21 Nov 2013 01:42:11 +0000 (20:42 -0500)
__btrfs_start_workers returns 0 in case it raced with
btrfs_stop_workers and lost the race.  This is wrong because worker in
this case is not allowed to start and is in fact destroyed.  Return
-EINVAL instead.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
fs/btrfs/async-thread.c

index 8aec751..c1e0b0c 100644 (file)
@@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ static int __btrfs_start_workers(struct btrfs_workers *workers)
        spin_lock_irq(&workers->lock);
        if (workers->stopping) {
                spin_unlock_irq(&workers->lock);
+               ret = -EINVAL;
                goto fail_kthread;
        }
        list_add_tail(&worker->worker_list, &workers->idle_list);