MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt()
authorDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:18:56 +0000 (17:18 +0100)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:36:08 +0000 (10:36 -0700)
commitd1c6d2e547148c5aa0c0a4ff6aac82f7c6da1d8b
tree1e148af6f4898465b1f7387be335734700bf9ff8
parent6d242a263618ba7f0f9a41dd91b347d19e704bbe
MN10300: Change the fault handler to check in_atomic() not in_interrupt()

Change the MN10300 fault handler to make it check in_atomic() rather than
in_interrupt() as commit 6edaf68a87d17570790fd55f0c451a29ec1d6703 did for other
architectures:

Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date:   Wed Dec 6 20:32:18 2006 -0800

[PATCH] mm: arch do_page_fault() vs in_atomic()

In light of the recent pagefault and filemap_copy_from_user work I've
gone through all the arch pagefault handlers to make sure the
inc_preempt_count() 'feature' works as expected.

Several sections of code (including the new filemap_copy_from_user)
rely on the fact that faults do not take locks under increased preempt
count.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
arch/mn10300/mm/fault.c