From f577111302677e6d1448475821cc19ba8835f60e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?utf8?q?Ilpo=20J=C3=A4rvinen?= <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:35:11 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] [TCP]: Extend reordering detection to cover CA_Loss partially
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's
overall comment:

  "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when
   we cannot account for retransmits accurately."

When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that
undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skbs were found,
thus having non-zero undo_marker in CA_Loss basically tells
that the R-bits still accurately reflect the current state
of TCP.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed