From b74d4eb2fea52b6e29852fd1ac3d5dc71b56ccc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:11:07 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] xen/events: Mask a moving irq

commit ff1e22e7a638a0782f54f81a6c9cb139aca2da35 upstream.

Moving an unmasked irq may result in irq handler being invoked on both
source and target CPUs.

With 2-level this can happen as follows:

On source CPU:
        evtchn_2l_handle_events() ->
            generic_handle_irq() ->
                handle_edge_irq() ->
                   eoi_pirq():
                       irq_move_irq(data);

                       /***** WE ARE HERE *****/

                       if (VALID_EVTCHN(evtchn))
                           clear_evtchn(evtchn);

If at this moment target processor is handling an unrelated event in
evtchn_2l_handle_events()'s loop it may pick up our event since target's
cpu_evtchn_mask claims that this event belongs to it *and* the event is
unmasked and still pending. At the same time, source CPU will continue
executing its own handle_edge_irq().

With FIFO interrupt the scenario is similar: irq_move_irq() may result
in a EVTCHNOP_unmask hypercall which, in turn, may make the event
pending on the target CPU.

We can avoid this situation by moving and clearing the event while
keeping event masked.

Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Adjust filename
 - Add a suitable definition of test_and_set_mask()]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed