From a96cfd6e9176ad442233001b7d15e9ed42234320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:19:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] oom: move OOM_DISABLE check from oom_kill_task to out_of_memory() Presently if oom_kill_allocating_task is enabled and current have OOM_DISABLED, following printk in oom_kill_process is called twice. pr_err("%s: Kill process %d (%s) score %lu or sacrifice child\n", message, task_pid_nr(p), p->comm, points); So, OOM_DISABLE check should be more early. Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: David Rientjes Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/oom_kill.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 011181ed41e3..79b34831ad79 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static void dump_header(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order, static int oom_kill_task(struct task_struct *p) { p = find_lock_task_mm(p); - if (!p || p->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE) { + if (!p) { task_unlock(p); return 1; } @@ -686,7 +686,8 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask, read_lock(&tasklist_lock); if (sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task && - !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask)) { + !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask) && + (current->signal->oom_adj != OOM_DISABLE)) { /* * oom_kill_process() needs tasklist_lock held. If it returns * non-zero, current could not be killed so we must fallback to -- 2.39.2