From a8375bd81cf99cb81be37127eaf08316ecb87619 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:59:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86: strengthen 64-bit p?d_bad()

The x86_64 pgd_bad(), pud_bad(), pmd_bad() inlines have differed from
their x86_32 counterparts in a couple of ways: they've been unnecessarily
weak (e.g. letting 0 or 1 count as good), and were typed as unsigned long.
Strengthen them and return int.

The PAE pmd_bad was too weak before, allowing any junk in the upper half;
but got strengthened by the patch correcting its ~PAGE_MASK to ~PTE_MASK.
The PAE pud_bad already said ~PTE_MASK; and since it folds into pgd_bad,
and we don't set the protection bits at that level, it'll do as is.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed