From 7ade67b5984d0a0434462fda733ab5138c63aae1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:55:22 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: move enabling of GIC before CPUs are set online

Commit 53ae3acd (arm64: Only enable local interrupts after the CPU
is marked online) moved the enabling of the GIC after the CPUs are
marked online.

This has some interesting effect:
[...]
[<ffffffc0002eefd8>] gic_raise_softirq+0xf8/0x160
[<ffffffc000088f58>] smp_send_reschedule+0x38/0x40
[<ffffffc0000c8728>] resched_task+0x84/0xc0
[<ffffffc0000c8cdc>] check_preempt_curr+0x58/0x98
[<ffffffc0000c8d38>] ttwu_do_wakeup+0x1c/0xf4
[<ffffffc0000c8f90>] ttwu_do_activate.constprop.84+0x64/0x70
[<ffffffc0000cad30>] try_to_wake_up+0x1d4/0x2b4
[<ffffffc0000cae6c>] default_wake_function+0x10/0x18
[<ffffffc0000c5ca4>] __wake_up_common+0x60/0xa0
[<ffffffc0000c7784>] complete+0x48/0x64
[<ffffffc000088bec>] secondary_start_kernel+0xe8/0x110
[...]

Here, we end-up calling gic_raise_softirq without having initialized
the interrupt controller for this CPU. While this goes unnoticed
with GICv2 (the distributor is always accessible), it explodes with
GICv3.

The fix is to move the call to notify_cpu_starting before we set
the secondary CPU online.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed