From 6be195886ac26abe0194ed1bc7a9224f8a97c310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 18:04:53 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: replace WORK_CPU_NONE/LAST with WORK_CPU_END

Now that workqueue has moved away from gcwqs, workqueue no longer has
the need to have a CPU identifier indicating "no cpu associated" - we
now use WORK_OFFQ_POOL_NONE instead - and most uses of WORK_CPU_NONE
are gone.

The only left usage is as the end marker for for_each_*wq*()
iterators, where the name WORK_CPU_NONE is confusing w/o actual
WORK_CPU_NONE usages.  Similarly, WORK_CPU_LAST which equals
WORK_CPU_NONE no longer makes sense.

Replace both WORK_CPU_NONE and LAST with WORK_CPU_END.  This patch
doesn't introduce any functional difference.

tj: s/WORK_CPU_LAST/WORK_CPU_END/ and rewrote the description.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed