From 43c638e3dd48ff1b1a93ea01c98e258e693880c3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Philipp Zabel Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:19:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator, part 2 Since the patch "cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: NULL is a valid regulator", cpu_reg contains an error value if the regulator is not set, instead of NULL. Accordingly, fix the remaining check for non-NULL cpu_reg. Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c index 78c49d8e0f4a..c522a95c0e16 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int cpu0_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-latency", &transition_latency)) transition_latency = CPUFREQ_ETERNAL; - if (cpu_reg) { + if (!IS_ERR(cpu_reg)) { struct opp *opp; unsigned long min_uV, max_uV; int i; -- 2.39.2