From 3fc8206d3dca1550eb0a1f6e2a350881835954ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:30:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] xHCI: use gfp flags from caller instead of GFP_ATOMIC

The caller is allowed to specify the GFP flags for these functions.
We should prefer their flags unless we have good reason.  For
example, if we take a spin_lock ourselves we'd need to use
GFP_ATOMIC.  But in this case it's safe to use the callers GFP
flags.

The callers all pass GFP_ATOMIC here, so this change doesn't affect
how the kernel behaves but we may add other callers later and this
is a cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed