From 25442cafb8cc3d979418caccabc91260707a0947 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 17:42:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NETPOLL]: Fixups for 'fix soft lockup when removing module'

>From my recent patch:

> >    #1
> >    Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work()
> >    required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with
> >    delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces
> >    this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't
> >    require this, so here it's only for uniformity.

But Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> found:

> But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged?
>
> In fact, I suspect this change adds a race,
...

His description was right (thanks), so this patch reverts #1.

Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed