From 942670d0dc41b5fe9b735c31ca9234d80729bf7e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wen Congyang Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:11:47 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm/numa: Don't check if node is NUMA_NO_NODE If we aren't debugging per_cpu maps, the cpu's node is stored in per_cpu variable numa_node. If `node' is NUMA_NO_NODE, it means the caller wants to clear the cpu's node. So we should also call set_cpu_numa_node() in this case. Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang Cc: Len Brown Cc: Pavel Machek Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c index 2d125be1bae9..21d02f0d7a2c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c @@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ void __cpuinit numa_set_node(int cpu, int node) #endif per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu) = node; - if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE) - set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node); + set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node); } void __cpuinit numa_clear_node(int cpu) -- 2.39.2