From d515afe88a32e567c550e3db914f3e378f86453a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:12:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] tmpfs: no need to use i_lock

2.6.36's 7e496299d4d2 ("tmpfs: make tmpfs scalable with percpu_counter for
used blocks") to make tmpfs scalable with percpu_counter used
inode->i_lock in place of sbinfo->stat_lock around i_blocks updates; but
that was adverse to scalability, and unnecessary, since info->lock is
already held there in the fast paths.

Remove those uses of i_lock, and add info->lock in the three error paths
where it's then needed across shmem_free_blocks().  It's not actually
needed across shmem_unacct_blocks(), but they're so often paired that it
looks wrong to split them apart.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed