From d060c1695345df6c82b5253acb7055698b2bf002 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:31:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Reorganize the overclock code

The existing code (which I changed last) was very convoluted. I believe
it was attempting to skip the overclock portion if the previous pcode
write failed. When I last touched the code, I was preserving this
behavior. There is some benefit to doing it that way in that if the
first pcode access fails, the later is likely invalid.

Having a bit more confidence in my understanding of how things work, I
now feel it's better to have clear, readable, code than to try to skip
over this one operation in an unusual case.

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed