From cf01f4eef9fe367ec0d85b38dd7214e29e376cdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:41:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] locks: only validate the lock vs. f_mode in F_SETLK codepaths

v2: replace missing break in switch statement (as pointed out by Dave
    Jones)

commit bce7560d4946 (locks: consolidate checks for compatible
filp->f_mode values in setlk handlers) introduced a regression in the
F_GETLK handler.

flock64_to_posix_lock is a shared codepath between F_GETLK and F_SETLK,
but the f_mode checks should only be applicable to the F_SETLK codepaths
according to POSIX.

Instead of just reverting the patch, add a new function to do this
checking and have the F_SETLK handlers call it.

Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Reported-and-Tested-by: Reuben Farrelly <reuben@reub.net>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed