From c41bf8fa5e777b6a8a19cf2484937a7167eac77f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kiszka Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 19:27:21 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here. Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops. Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen --- Reading git-format-patch failed