From bace7117d3fb59a6ed7ea1aa6c8994df6a28a72a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 21:20:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: (Re-)rename __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max to
 __NR_syscall_compat_max

Brian Gerst noticed that I did a weird rename in the following commit:

   b2502b418e63 ("x86/asm/entry: Untangle 'system_call' into two entry points: entry_SYSCALL_64 and entry_INT80_32")

which renamed __NR_ia32_syscall_max to __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max.

Now the original name was a misnomer, but the new one is a misnomer as well,
as all the 32-bit compat syscall entry points (sysenter, syscall) share the
system call table, not just the INT80 based one.

Rename it to __NR_syscall_compat_max.

Reported-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed