From b84d5f0c22914d37d709add54c66e741c404fa56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 01:38:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Inline i915_gem_ring_retire_request()

Change the semantics to retire any buffer older than the current seqno
rather than repeatedly calling calling the function to retire the
buffer at the head of the list matching the request seqno.

Whilst this should have no semantic impact on the implementation, Daniel
was wondering if there was a bug where we might miss a retirement and so
end up with a continually growing active list.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed