From a11607f5a145818e097c64c72c839bcf6907e110 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jon Paul Maloy Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:40:44 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] tipc: correct usage of spin_lock() vs spin_lock_bh() I commit e099e86c9e24fe9aff36773600543eb31d8954d ("tipc: add node_lock protection to link lookup function") we are calling spin_lock(&node->lock) directly instead of indirectly via the tipc_node_lock(node) function. However, tipc_node_lock() is using spin_lock_bh(), not spin_lock(), something leading to unbalanced usage in one place, and a smatch warning. We fix this by consistently using tipc_node_lock()/unlock() in in the places touched by the mentioned commit. Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- Reading git-format-patch failed