From 76af4d936153afec176c53378e6ba8671e7e237d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:30:00 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: update synchronization rules on workqueue->pwqs

Make workqueue->pwqs protected by workqueue_lock for writes and
sched-RCU protected for reads.  Lockdep assertions are added to
for_each_pwq() and first_pwq() and all their users are converted to
either hold workqueue_lock or disable preemption/irq.

alloc_and_link_pwqs() is updated to use list_add_tail_rcu() for
consistency which isn't strictly necessary as the workqueue isn't
visible.  destroy_workqueue() isn't updated to sched-RCU release pwqs.
This is okay as the workqueue should have on users left by that point.

The locking is superflous at this point.  This is to help
implementation of unbound pools/pwqs with custom attributes.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes.

v2: Updated for_each_pwq() use if/else for the hidden assertion
    statement instead of just if as suggested by Lai.  This avoids
    confusing the following else clause.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed