From 721435a7679e13f810133dbea769f87ad7bae3a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 01:06:21 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ufs_inode_getblock(): pass index instead of 'fragment'

The value passed to ufs_inode_getblock() as the 3rd argument
had lower bits ignored; the upper bits were shifted down
and used and they actually make sense - those are _lower_ bits
of index in indirect block (i.e. they form the index within
a fragment within an indirect block).

Pass those as argument.  Upper bits of index (i.e. the number
of fragment within indirect block) will join them shortly.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed