From 4c7a6f74ceeafd738b55d1c57349327f7ea8e895 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 00:25:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: rework ulist with list+rb_tree

We are really suffering from now ulist's implementation, some developers
gave their try, and i just gave some of my ideas for things:

 1. use list+rb_tree instead of arrary+rb_tree

 2. add cur_list to iterator rather than ulist structure.

 3. add seqnum into every node when they are added, this is
 used to do selfcheck when iterating node.

I noticed Zach Brown's comments before, long term is to kick off
ulist implementation, however, for now, we need at least avoid
arrary from ulist.

Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed