From 388b2b97ba03242145227821c77791e713d6057b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:10:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Staging: sst: more copy_to_user() changes

Vinod wanted the copy_to_user() calls in this format:
	if (copy_to_user())
		retval = -EFAULT;
instead of this:
	retval = copy_to_user();
	if (retval)
		retval = -EFAULt;

I've done that for the whole intel_sst_app_interface.c file.  In the
process I noticed a couple more places that returned -EBUSY or -EAGAIN
instead of -EFAULT.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed