From 231e54f6391ccc7a3377df5bbaff3800822def1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Damien Lespiau Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:55:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Consolidate ILK_DSPCLK_GATE and PCH_DSPCLK_GATE Register 0x42020 was defined twice under the names PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D and ILK_DSPCLK_GATE. This patch consolidate the 2 sets of defines in one. The transforms done are: PCH_DSPCLK_GATE_D -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D ILK_DSPCLK_GATE -> ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE ILK_DPARB_CLK_GATE -> ILK_DPARBUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE ILK_DPFD_CLK_GATE -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE ILK_CLK_FBC -> ILK_DPFDUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE ILK_DPFC_DIS1 -> ILK_DPFCRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE ILK_DPFC_DIS2 -> ILK_DPFCUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE We have a VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE define for the pre-ILK DSPCLK_GATE_D. Even if the same bit is used in ILK_DSPCLK_GATE_D, other bits in the register change, so I went with re-defining it, well more precisely rename IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE, which is not specific to IVB+. So: IVB_VRHUNIT_CLK_GATE -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE -> ILK_VHRUNIT_CLOCK_GATE_DISABLE (ILK+ code) This commit is only a renaming commit, further commits will clean up the logic. v2: Rename bit 5 and 7 to _ENABLE as setting them to 1 enables clock gating on their respective units, contrary to all of the other bits (Paulo Zanoni) Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- Reading git-format-patch failed