From 0c4d2d95d06e920e0c61707e62c7fffc9c57f63a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 15:03:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: use i_version instead of our own sequence

We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody
would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which
serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's
sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the
board, and not just in file write.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed