From 01839f6ddef011878e905d72786d95cee21ca039 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:25:29 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] libata-sff: Correct use of check_status()

ata_check_status() does an SFF compliant check
ata_chk_status() does a generic call to ap->ops->check_status (usually
ata_check_status)

libata-sff uses the wrong one. Hardly suprising given the naming here,
which ought to get fixed to ata_sff_check_status() perhaps ?

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
---
Reading git-format-patch failed