nfsd: don't destroy clients that are busy
authorJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:27:14 +0000 (08:27 -0400)
committerJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Tue, 5 Aug 2014 14:55:01 +0000 (10:55 -0400)
It's possible that we'll have an in-progress call on some of the clients
while a rogue EXCHANGE_ID or DESTROY_CLIENTID call comes in. Be sure to
try and mark the client expired first, so that the refcount is
respected.

This will only be a problem once the client_mutex is removed.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

No differences found