SuperH IrDA: correct Baud rate error correction
authorNicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:24:02 +0000 (14:24 +0000)
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 18:09:53 +0000 (10:09 -0800)
It looks to me as if the second value of rate_err_array is intended
to be a decimal 625. However, with a leading 0 it becomes an octal
constant, and as such evaluates to a decimal 405.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

No differences found